LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HRES 18119th CongressIn Committee

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Parthenon Marbles should be returned to Greece.

Introduced: Jan 7, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This House Resolution expresses the sense of the U.S. House of Representatives that the Government of the United Kingdom should enter into negotiations with the Government of Greece to facilitate the return of the Parthenon Marbles to Greece. Framed as a non-binding statement of opinion, the measure relies on historical context (the marbles’ removal by Lord Elgin in the early 19th century) and arguments about cultural heritage, reunification, and the care of the artifacts. It emphasizes that returning the marbles would be a goodwill gesture by the UK, would not set a legal precedent or affect ownership of other objects, and would align with Greece’s claim to cultural heritage and ongoing diplomatic dialogue. As a sense of Congress, it does not create new U.S. law but signals congressional support for diplomacy aimed at restoring the Parthenon Marbles to Greece. Potential impact includes strengthening U.S. moral and diplomatic support for artifact repatriation efforts, potentially influencing ongoing discussions between the UK and Greece, and shaping public and diplomatic discourse around cultural heritage and museum stewardship. It is non-binding and primarily serves as a formal expression of congressional opinion to influence international diplomacy rather than domestic policy or funding.

Key Points

  • 1It expresses a non-binding sense that the United Kingdom should negotiate with Greece to return the Parthenon Marbles to Greece.
  • 2It presents the marbles as integral to the Parthenon and to global cultural heritage, arguing that reunification best conveys their original context and significance.
  • 3It asserts that the removal occurred under questionable circumstances in the early 1800s and that Greece has sought their return since gaining independence in 1830.
  • 4It characterizes the return as a goodwill gesture by the British Parliament that would not set a legal precedent or affect ownership of other objects in museums.
  • 5It notes Greece’s care for the marbles and its New Acropolis Museum, and it references already existing diplomatic engagement between Greece and the United Kingdom.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy, particularly relations with Greece and the United Kingdom, and international cultural heritage policy. The resolution can shape diplomatic signaling and public messaging but does not change law or create new programs.Secondary group/area affected- Greece and the United Kingdom (policymakers and cultural institutions like the British Museum), along with the broader global community concerned with museum practices and artifact repatriation.- Cultural heritage professionals, educators, and scholars who study provenance, repatriation, and international museum ethics.Additional impacts- Influences public debate and legitimacy of repatriation efforts, potentially affecting future discussions on other contested artifacts.- Maintains a non-binding stance, so no direct funding or regulatory changes in the United States would result from the measure.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025