LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HRES 28119th CongressIn Committee

BRIDGE to Congress Resolution

Introduced: Jan 9, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

H. Res. 28, the BRIDGE to Congress Resolution, is a House Rules resolution introduced January 9, 2025 by Rep. Perez (for herself and Rep. Golden of Maine). It aims to change House procedural rules governing witness testimony at committee proceedings. Specifically, it would remove the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely only at the discretion of the chair. By amending Section 3(i)(1) of House Resolution 5 (the current rules package agreed to January 3, 2025) the resolution broadens the ability of witnesses to testify remotely, not just subject to the chair’s discretionary approval. In short, if adopted, this would make remote input from witnesses at committee hearings more accessible by reducing the chair’s gatekeeping role. This is a procedural rule change inside the House (a resolution, not a statute), and its practical effect will depend on subsequent floor action and any further rulemaking by the Rules Committee and the House as a whole.

Key Points

  • 1Elimination of the chair-discretion gate: The bill seeks to remove the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely only at the discretion of the chair of the committee.
  • 2Specific legal change: The amendment targets Section 3(i)(1) of House Resolution 5 by striking the phrase “at the discretion of the chair of the committee and,” thereby broadening remote testimony eligibility.
  • 3Short/long title: Cites the BRIDGE to Congress Resolution as both the short and long-form name for this measure.
  • 4Status and sponsorship: Introduced January 9, 2025, by Rep. Perez (for herself and Rep. Golden of Maine) and referred to the House Rules Committee.
  • 5Scope and applicability: Applies to proceedings of House committees; the effect depends on the House adopting the resolution and any accompanying rule changes by the Rules Committee.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Witnesses and subject-matter experts who seek to testify remotely (including individuals with travel, health, or accessibility constraints) and the committees that hear testimony.Secondary group/area affected- Members of Congress and committee staff, who would interact with witnesses under a potentially broader set of remote hearing options.Additional impacts- Accessibility and participation: Potentially higher participation from a wider geographic area and from individuals with limited ability to travel.- Operational considerations: Requires reliable remote hearing infrastructure and procedures to manage identity verification, security, and order during remote testimony.- Transparency and accountability: Could affect how testimony is scheduled, recorded, and evaluated, with implications for the perceived openness of the hearing process.- Budget and logistics: Possible changes to travel costs and scheduling dynamics for witnesses and committees.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 4, 2025