LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 455119th CongressIn Committee

Protecting Higher Education from Foreign Threats Act

Introduced: Jan 15, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Protecting Higher Education from Foreign Threats Act would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to bar any institution of higher education from receiving federal funds in an award year if it employs an instructor who is funded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Under the bill, an institution could regain eligibility in a future award year only after proving to the Secretary that it no longer employs a CCP-funded instructor. The definition of a CCP-funded instructor covers anyone who provides direct instruction to students and has received funds from the CCP while employed by the institution. The new prohibition would take effect 180 days after enactment. The bill aims to limit CCP influence in U.S. higher education by tying federal funding to the absence of CCP-funded instructors.

Key Points

  • 1Prohibition on eligibility: An institution cannot receive federal funds for an award year if it employs a CCP-funded instructor.
  • 2Reinstatement of eligibility: An institution that loses eligibility can regain it in a subsequent award year by demonstrating that it no longer employs a CCP-funded instructor.
  • 3Definition of CCP-funded instructor: A person who provides direct instruction to students and has received funds from the CCP (directly or indirectly) while employed by the institution.
  • 4Effective date: The new prohibition takes effect 180 days after enactment.
  • 5Legislative status: Introduced in the House (H.R. 455) on January 15, 2025, sponsored by Mr. Steube and referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce.

Impact Areas

Primary: Institutions of higher education (administrators, human resources, and compliance offices) stand to lose federal funds if they employ CCP-funded instructors and must ensure their staffing is compliant.Secondary: Federal programs and funding administrators responsible for enforcing eligibility rules and monitoring compliance; students at affected institutions who rely on federal funds could be impacted if funds are withheld.Additional impacts: Potential shifts in hiring practices and international collaboration policies; increased regulatory burden and monitoring to verify instructor funding sources; possible ambiguity around what counts as “CCP funds” (direct or indirect) and how to verify compliance could raise enforcement and due-process questions.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025