LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HRES 78119th CongressIn Committee

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit certain resolutions to be privileged only if they are based on conduct which was the subject of an investigation and report by the appropriate committee of jurisdiction or if they are offered by direction of a party caucus or conference.

Introduced: Jan 28, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This House resolution would change how certain sanctions against government officers and members can be treated as “privileged” under the House rules. Specifically, it would limit privileged status to only those resolutions that either (a) are based on conduct that has been investigated and reported on by the committee with jurisdiction, or (b) are offered by direction of a party caucus or conference. The targeted actions are those listed as impeaching a government officer, or censuring/reprimanding/expelling a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, or causing a vacancy in the Speaker’s office or in the chair or ranking minority chair of a committee. In short, most resolutions about sanctions would no longer automatically have privileged status unless they come with an affirmative committee investigation/report or are directed by a party caucus. The measure, introduced as H. Res. 78 by Ms. Williams of Georgia on January 28, 2025, would amend Rule IX of the House Rules. If enacted, it would place additional gatekeeping on when sanction-related resolutions can jump to expedited consideration, potentially slowing or redirecting how such actions are deployed and debated.

Key Points

  • 1Amends Rule IX by adding a new subsection that limits privileged status for certain resolutions.
  • 2The specified resolutions are those involving impeachment of a government officer, or censure/reprimand/expulsion, or causing a vacancy in the Speaker’s office or in a committee chair or ranking minority member.
  • 3For such resolutions to be privileged, one of two conditions must be satisfied:
  • 4If neither condition is met, these resolutions would not be privileged under Rule IX, affecting their procedural treatment in the House.
  • 5The sponsor and status indicate this is a Rules resolution introduced in the 119th Congress, referred to the Committee on Rules.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Members of the House, especially those facing sanctions, and the House as a procedural body; the Committee on Rules; and committees with jurisdiction over conduct and ethics matters.Secondary group/area affected- Officers and leaders implicated by such resolutions (e.g., government officers, Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners, Speaker, and committee chairs/ranking members).Additional impacts- Changes to the speed and manner in which sanction-related resolutions can advance (potentially slower without committee investigation or caucus direction).- Increased emphasis on committee investigations and formal reporting before privileged treatment can be sought.- Possible strategic use by party caucuses to direct privileged treatment for certain resolutions, preserving some executive or party control over sanction actions.- Administrative and procedural implications for how ethics and accountability actions are considered under House rules.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 31, 2025