LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 368119th CongressIn Committee

BLOCK Act

Introduced: Feb 3, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The BLOCK Act would add a sweeping, congressional-review framework to most federal agency rules. It creates a formal threshold: any rule that is expected to impose at least $50 million annually in compliance costs is treated as a major rule and must receive a joint resolution of approval from both chambers of Congress before it can take effect. Major rules require a specific congressional approval process (a joint resolution of approval) and a timely GAO review, with failure to approve in time resulting in the rule not taking effect. Nonmajor rules (those below the $50 million threshold) must rely on a separate congressional disapproval process. The bill also requires agencies to disclose data, studies, and cost-benefit analyses, and it imposes periodic review of existing rules, with a sunset if Congress has not approved them within specified time frames. There are exemptions (notably monetary policy) and special provisions related to the timing and scope of rule-making, as well as treatment of rules currently in effect and a budgeting provision tying rules to budgetary effects. In short, BLOCK shifts substantial regulatory control from agencies to Congress, creating formal, time-bound hurdles for major rules and giving Congress a path to disapprove or approve many rules before they can take effect.

Key Points

  • 1Major vs. nonmajor rules:
  • 2- Major rule: a rule with an annual compliance cost of at least $50,000,000, as determined by the Comptroller General (GAO).
  • 3- Nonmajor rule: any rule that does not meet the major-rule threshold.
  • 4Congressional approval for major rules:
  • 5- After a major rule is identified, Congress must consider a joint resolution of approval that, if enacted, approves the rule and allows it to take effect.
  • 6- The joint resolution must be introduced promptly by the House and Senate leaders; it cannot be amended in either chamber.
  • 7- If Congress does not enact the approval within the designated period, the major rule is deemed not approved and cannot take effect.
  • 8Congressional disapproval for nonmajor rules:
  • 9- Nonmajor rules may be disapproved through a joint resolution of disapproval within a 60-day window after Congress receives the rule.
  • 10- If Congress does not disapprove within that window, the nonmajor rule takes effect.
  • 11Information disclosure and analysis:
  • 12- Agencies must publish in the Federal Register a data package showing the basis for the rule, including data, studies, and the cost-benefit analysis, and how the public can access it online.
  • 13- Agencies must provide Congress with a complete cost-benefit analysis and related documents (e.g., unfunded mandates analyses, inflation impact, etc.).
  • 14- GAO must provide a report to committees with an assessment of compliance and the rule’s impact on private-sector activity.
  • 15Review and timing:
  • 16- Major rules take effect upon enactment of a joint resolution of approval or per the rule’s own timing after approval.
  • 17- Nonmajor rules take effect after submission to Congress as described in the process for nonmajor rules.
  • 18- There are time-based provisions for late-session adjournment and “additional review” procedures if a rule is submitted late in a session.
  • 19Review of rules currently in effect:
  • 20- Starting six months after enactment, agencies must annually select at least 20% of eligible rules for review and subject them to the same 801/802/803 review processes.
  • 21- If Congress does not approve designated rules within a 5-year window, those rules sunset (no effect).
  • 22- A single joint resolution can approve all eligible rules for a given year, unless a member seeks a separate resolution for a specific rule.
  • 23Exemptions:
  • 24- Monetary policy rules from the Federal Reserve System and FOMC are exempt from this process.
  • 25Special types of rules and timing:
  • 26- Certain rules (e.g., those affecting hunting, fishing, or camping) may have different effective-date rules.
  • 27- For good-cause rules where notice and procedures are impracticable or contrary to public interest, agencies may set an earlier effective date, though this remains subject to the act’s framework.
  • 28Budgetary effect provision:
  • 29- Rules subject to the BLOCK Act and affecting budget authority, outlays, or receipts are treated as effective unless Congress does not approve them under the act.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Federal agencies and rulemaking processes across the executive branch; agencies would face new procedural hurdles and potential delays for major rules.Secondary group/area affected- Businesses, state and local governments, and non-federal entities subject to major regulatory costs; the approval/disapproval cadence affects when and whether certain compliance costs take effect.Additional impacts- Congress gains a formal, recurring role in approving or disapproving major and many nonmajor rules, potentially slowing regulatory action and increasing legislative involvement in technical rulemaking.- Agencies must broaden transparency around data, studies, and economic analyses used to justify rules.- The annual review requirement creates a built-in sunset mechanism for a subset of rules, embedding a multi-year calendar for evaluating the ongoing need or impact of regulations.- The monetary policy exemption preserves status quo for monetary policy decisions by the Federal Reserve, avoiding conflicts with the central bank’s independence.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025