LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 937119th CongressIn Committee

Protecting Taxpayers from Student Loan Bailouts Act

Introduced: Feb 4, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This bill would curb the Department of Education’s ability to propose or finalize regulations and executive actions related to Title IV of the Higher Education Act. It adds a new section (Sec. 492A) that requires the Secretary of Education to conduct extra analyses on draft regulations and to halt any regulation or executive action that is economically significant if it would increase the government’s subsidy costs. In short, if a proposed regulatory change would raise the government's costs tied to student loan subsidies, the bill would prohibit moving forward. The standard for “economically significant” regulations is a substantial annual economic impact (at least $100 million) or a materially adverse impact on the economy, a sector, jobs, or other public interests. The intent is to limit new federal regulations that could be costly to taxpayers in the context of student loan programs, adding to existing cost analyses required by law and executive orders. The effect would be to slow or block certain policies or actions aimed at changing how federal student loan programs operate if they are projected to increase subsidy costs.

Key Points

  • 1Creates new Sec. 492A to Part G of Title IV of the Higher Education Act, restricting the Secretary of Education’s ability to propose or issue regulations and executive actions related to Title IV programs.
  • 2For draft regulations deemed economically significant, the Secretary must assess whether they would increase subsidy costs; if so, further action on the draft regulation may be blocked.
  • 3Prohibits issuance of proposed rules, final regulations, or executive actions that are economically significant and would increase subsidy costs.
  • 4Requires these analyses in addition to, not in place of, other mandatory cost analyses required under law and relevant executive orders (e.g., EO 12866 and EO 13563).
  • 5Defines “economically significant” as likely to have a substantial annual economic impact (at least $100 million) or to adversely affect the economy or related factors in a material way.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Federal taxpayers and the federal budget, through potential changes to subsidy costs associated with student loan programs.- The Department of Education and its rulemaking processes, particularly for regulations related to Title IV programs.Secondary group/area affected- Student loan borrowers, especially those who might be affected by future regulatory changes to programs like income-driven repayment, forgiveness, or other subsidy-related aspects.- Higher education institutions, loan servicers, and lenders who operate under federal loan programs and are affected by regulatory changes.Additional impacts- State, local, and tribal governments and communities, if regulatory actions have broader economic or sectoral effects.- The broader economy and regulatory climate, since the bill raises the threshold and adds cost analyses that could delay or block regulations, potentially shaping the pace of federal policy in higher education funding.- Administrative and legal processes, as agencies would need to perform extra analyses and may be constrained from taking action on economically significant, subsidy-cost-increasing regulations.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025