Back to all bills
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs
No Red and Blue Banks Act would restrict how the federal government procures banking services. Specifically, it would bar the General Services Administration (GSA) from awarding contracts to insured depository institutions (and their affiliates) that refuse to do business with certain companies because those companies are engaged in lawful commerce merely to push a social or political policy. In practice, the bill targets banks that boycott or avoid business with specific companies for ideological reasons. The goal is to prevent banks from using political considerations to influence who they do business with when the government is the client. The prohibition would not apply to contracts awarded before the bill becomes law.
Key Points
- 1Prohibition on GSA awards: The GSA may not award a contract to an insured depository institution or its affiliate if that bank avoids doing business with certain companies for social-policy reasons.
- 2Who qualifies as “insured depository institution”: The bill uses the standard definition from the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (banks and similar depository institutions), including affiliates.
- 3Scope of “certain companies”: The banks would be avoiding business with companies the bank believes are engaged in lawful commerce based solely on social policy considerations. The bill does not name specific companies.
- 4Timing: The restriction applies to contracts awarded after enactment; it does not apply to contracts already in place before the law passes.
- 5Sponsorship and status: Introduced in the Senate on February 4, 2025, by Senator Kennedy (joined by Senator Cramer) and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Impact Areas
Primary: insured depository institutions (banks) and their affiliates. Banks that engage in social-policy-based boycotts could lose eligibility for GSA contracts, while banks that do not engage in such boycotts would remain eligible.Government procurement: The GSA’s contractor pool for banking services could shift toward institutions that do not discriminate against companies for political or social reasons.Businesses and suppliers: Companies that might have been affected by a bank’s social-policy-based refusals could see changes in how banks decide to do business with them if those banks become ineligible for GSA contracts. Conversely, banks that avoid such boycotts may gain or maintain government business.Broader implications: The bill touches on ongoing debates about corporate political activism, the use of political criteria in business decisions, and potential tensions with business autonomy or free-market considerations. It does not create a universal ban on political beliefs in business decisions, but ties eligibility for a major federal contracting program to avoiding social-policy-based exclusions.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025