The Sue VOYEURS Act would create a federal civil right of action for people whose intimate visual depictions were captured without their consent under circumstances where they reasonably expect privacy. The action targets the person who captured the image, proving that they knew or recklessly disregarded the lack of consent, and that the capture occurred in a context with interstate or foreign commerce involvement. If established, plaintiffs could recover actual damages or a mandatory liquidated damages amount of $150,000 per depiction, plus court costs and attorneys’ fees, and courts could grant injunctive relief to stop ongoing display or disclosure. The bill also allows for anonymity for plaintiffs and provides guardians or representatives to sue on behalf of minors, the incapacitated, or deceased individuals, with certain protections about naming guardians in the action. There is an explicit exception for actions involving law enforcement officers or agencies acting under a lawfully issued warrant, meaning those actions cannot be the subject of this civil action. The statute relies on a broad interstate commerce hook and defines key terms (e.g., “intimate visual depiction,” “consent,” “private area,” and “broadcast”) to cover videography, photography, or other forms of capture and any subsequent distribution. In short, the bill creates a federal, private right of action to deter and provide redress for non-consensual capturing and dissemination of intimate images, with substantial damages possible per image and a focus on preserving victim anonymity when desired.
Key Points
- 1Civil right of action for non-consensual intimate image capture: Individuals whose intimate visual depictions are captured without consent, in places where they have a reasonable privacy expectation, may sue the person who captured the image in federal court if the capture involved interstate or foreign commerce.
- 2Damages and relief: Plaintiffs may recover actual damages or $150,000 per depiction, plus litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Courts may issue injunctive relief (temporary, preliminary, or permanent) to stop display or disclosure of the image and may protect plaintiff anonymity.
- 3Guardians and representatives: For minors, incapacitated, or deceased individuals, a guardian or representative may sue on behalf of the person, but the defendant cannot be named as that representative or guardian.
- 4Law enforcement exception: The act does not apply to actions by law enforcement officers or agencies conducting surveillance under a lawful warrant.
- 5Definitions and scope: The bill defines key terms—such as “intimate visual depiction,” “consent,” “private area,” and “broadcast”—and relies on interstate commerce links to reach federal court, ensuring coverage of online or cross-border contexts.