LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 1239119th CongressIn Committee

Voluntary Sustainable Apparel Labeling Act

Introduced: Feb 12, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Voluntary Sustainable Apparel Labeling Act would require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create a voluntary labeling program for apparel. The program would allow companies to submit garments (or their packaging) to receive an “apparel sustainability label” that presents a numerical, life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions summary for the product. The life-cycle includes stages from the growing of raw materials through manufacturing, transport, use (including washing and ironing), and end-of-life. A QR code at the point of sale would link to detailed information and the program’s database. Data on the label would be split into two parts: information reported by the manufacturer and information estimated by the EPA based on typical use. The program would be voluntary—there is no mandate to reduce emissions—and would be designed with input from the Agriculture Department and the Federal Trade Commission. Regulations would be finalized within two years, and various supporting components (verification standards, an advisory panel, a certification program, a consumer-outreach plan, and a public database) would be established. The act also lays out penalties for fraudulent use of the label and requires periodic evaluation and potential revisions of the program beginning seven years after enactment and every five years thereafter. Key technical terms: - Life-cycle assessment: evaluating environmental impacts of a product from raw materials to end of life. - GHG emissions: the release of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.

Key Points

  • 1Establishment and governance: EPA must create a voluntary labeling program, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the FTC, with final regulations due within two years of enactment.
  • 2Label content and data access: participating garments receive an apparel sustainability label showing a numerical life-cycle GHG emissions summary, plus a QR code linking to full data, the program’s database, and related information; the label may distinguish data reported by the manufacturer from EPA-estimated data.
  • 3Verification and standards: the EPA must set uniform verification standards using the best available science, align with international carbon accounting standards (ISO 14040/14044 and GHG Protocol), designate who can measure and verify data, and certify entities to perform verification; an expert advisory panel (apparel industry stakeholders) will advise on requirements.
  • 4Voluntary commitments: the program may include voluntary commitments by participants to reduce life-cycle GHG emissions and to publicly share sustainability information; participation in these commitments is encouraged but not mandated.
  • 5Oversight, database, and consumer outreach: the EPA must create a public database within two years; launch a consumer-outreach program within three years; and begin periodic evaluation and reporting on the program’s effectiveness (every seven years, then every five years) with possible amendments; penalties for fraudulent use are specified.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Apparel manufacturers and retailers: entities that produce, market, and sell clothing would participate to obtain labels, report data, and potentially commit to emissions reductions.- Consumers and retail environments: labeled products and accessible label data (via QR codes) aimed at informing purchasing decisions at the point of sale.Secondary group/area affected- EPA, USDA, and FTC: involved in program development, regulation, and enforcement; potential alignment with other labeling and marketing rules.- Entities that measure, monitor, verify, and report data: would participate in the verification and certification process.- Education and advocacy groups: could use the program to evaluate and comment on environmental claims.Additional impacts- Market transparency and competition: could drive improvements in product sustainability and provide a new basis for comparing products.- Compliance costs and operational changes: firms may incur costs to collect data, verify information, and adjust labeling practices; small businesses could face particular challenges.- Data accessibility and privacy considerations: a public database and detailed product data may raise questions about data sharing and commercially sensitive information, though the program emphasizes standardization and verification.- Environmental outcomes: while participation is voluntary, the labeling framework could encourage reductions in greenhouse gas emissions across the apparel life cycle, depending on uptake and industry response.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 31, 2025