LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 1928119th CongressIn Committee

Sanctuary City Accountability Act

Introduced: Mar 6, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Sanctuary City Accountability Act would create a private federal right of action that allows US nationals to sue sanctuary jurisdictions (states or local governments that have policies perceived as obstructing immigration enforcement) in federal district court. A plaintiff could seek injunctive relief or compensatory damages if a noncitizen (an “alien”) located in the sanctuary jurisdiction commits a crime against the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s immediate family, either in that jurisdiction or in a place the alien later moves to. The bill defines “sanctuary jurisdiction” by listing specific practices that obstruct immigration enforcement, such as resisting ICE detainers, placing unreasonable conditions on detainer compliance, denying ICE access to interview incarcerated aliens, or otherwise hindering information exchange with federal immigration officers. The bill also limits liability for local governments for policies imposed by the state in which they are located, meaning the liability language principally targets sanctuary policies themselves rather than state-imposed requirements on localities. In short, the bill would deputize private individuals to sue sanctuary jurisdictions for damages or to obtain court orders, limited to crimes involving aliens who were in or relocated from sanctuary jurisdictions, with defined categories of sanctuary practices and a general immunity for local governments from liability for state-imposed policies.

Key Points

  • 1Private right of action established under INA Title I, adding a new Sec. 107 granting a private civil action in federal court.
  • 2Eligible plaintiffs: any United States national may sue for themselves or an immediate family member if a crime by an alien occurs in the sanctuary jurisdiction or after the alien relocates.
  • 3Available relief: injunctive relief (court orders) or compensatory damages; no explicit mention of punitive damages.
  • 4Sanctuary jurisdiction defined by specific anti-ICE enforcement practices (four listed categories, including detainer refusals, unreasonable detainer compliance conditions, denying ICE access to interviews, and hindering information exchanges).
  • 5Liability limitations for local governments: a unit of local government may not be held liable for enforcing or implementing a state-imposed law, ordinance, or policy; liability would primarily attach to sanctuary policies themselves rather than the state’s mandates on localities.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: sanctuary jurisdictions (states and localities with immigration-enforcement-obstructing policies) and their governments; private US nationals who are victims or whose immediate family members are victims of crimes involving aliens.Secondary group/area affected: victims and families of crimes involving aliens, as well as federal immigration enforcement dynamics (ICE) due to the new private enforcement mechanism.Additional impacts: potential constitutional and procedural questions, including questions about sovereign immunity (especially with state governments and 11th Amendment considerations), standing and causation in private suits, and the absence of specified funding or administrative processes to support this new enforcement mechanism. The bill’s private action could influence local policy decisions and the broader relationship between state/local immigration policies and federal enforcement.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 1, 2025