Critical Materials Future Act of 2025
The Critical Materials Future Act of 2025 establishes a pilot program under the Department of Energy to support domestic processing of critical materials—minerals essential for national security, energy production, and advanced technologies. The program will provide financial support to at least three domestic projects that refine, process, or recycle raw critical materials into usable forms. Using innovative financial tools like price support contracts and forward purchasing agreements, the program aims to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign suppliers (particularly those from countries misaligned with U.S. interests), strengthen domestic supply chains, and evaluate which financial mechanisms work best for different critical materials. The pilot will run for up to five years, after which a comprehensive study will assess its effectiveness and inform future policy.
Key Points
- 1Pilot Program Scope: Establishes a 5-year pilot program supporting at least 3 domestic critical material processing projects, with funding of $750 million authorized
- 2Financial Tools: Authorizes use of innovative financial mechanisms including contracts for difference (price guarantees), price floors, advanced market commitments, and forward contracts to make projects economically viable
- 3Domestic Priority: Prioritizes projects using feedstock from U.S. sources or "reliable sources" (allied nations with free trade agreements or designated as major non-NATO allies), with preference for domestic feedstock
- 4Material Diversity: Requires support for at least 3 different critical materials, with no single material receiving more than 50% of program funding, to test financial tools across different markets
- 5Security Screening: Excludes support for entities of concern—foreign companies or those controlled by nations whose strategic interests conflict with the U.S., particularly regarding critical materials
- 6Evaluation and Reporting: Mandates annual reports to Congress and a comprehensive study within 2 years of program completion analyzing effectiveness, market impacts, and recommendations for future policy