Belt and Road Oversight Act
The Belt and Road Oversight Act would create a new role within the U.S. State Department called the Country China Officer at each embassy in countries with which the United States has diplomatic relations. These officers would monitor and report on China’s activities in their country, with a focus on Chinese investments in critical infrastructure and Belt and Road Initiative projects. The bill imposes a 10-year sunset, after which the designation would end unless renewed. It also requires a comprehensive, nationwide review of assets, debt, and projects funded or controlled by the PRC, including Belt and Road projects, and mandates annual reporting to Congress. In addition, the Act directs country-specific counter-Chinese influence strategies, procurement/projection reporting, and a sense-of-Congress provision urging the U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) to prioritize alternative financing for eligible countries that are targets of the Belt and Road Initiative. The overall aim is to increase transparency around PRC financing abroad and to bolster U.S. counter-efforts to PRC influence.
Key Points
- 1Establishment and duties of Country China Officers: The Secretary of State must have one Foreign Service Officer in each U.S. embassy or post in every country with whom the U.S. has diplomatic relations, designated within 60 days of enactment; officers monitor and report on PRC activity, including capital investments in critical infrastructure and Belt and Road projects; the designation is set to sunset 10 years after enactment.
- 2Comprehensive cross-country review and reporting (Section 3): Within 60 days, embassies, via the Country China Officers, must prepare reports detailing assets controlled or financed by the PRC or PRC state-owned enterprises. Reports must cover debt obligations to China, a list of projects financed by PRC banks, sovereign wealth funds, and other PRC-controlled financiers (including policy banks like CDB and ExIm, major state banks, sovereign wealth funds, and international institutions such as AIIB and NDB), identify Belt and Road projects, assess debt sustainability, list collateral, identify PRC-owned assets (telecom and critical infrastructure), and note research institutions controlled or financed by the PRC. Initial country reports due within one year; the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs distributes a consolidated report to multiple federal lawmakers and committees.
- 3Notification of future BRI projects (Section 4): After the initial reports, embassies must inform the Under Secretary of State within 30 days of becoming aware of any upcoming BRI-like project identified in the reports.
- 4Annual comprehensive reporting (Section 5): For a 10-year period, the Under Secretary must submit an annual report to Congress containing all findings from Country China Officers regarding PRC-financed or controlled projects, plus updated analyses on debt, collateral, and related findings.
- 5Annual counter-influence strategy (Section 6): Each Country China Officer, in consultation with the local Chief of Mission, must develop a country-specific strategy to counter PRC influence and anti-American messaging. The strategy should be used to equip diplomatic staff with tools to counter PRC influence. Chiefs of Mission must submit annual implementation reports, including challenges and opportunities; the Under Secretary must summarize these for relevant State Department bureaus. Countries with limited PRC investment are excluded from this strategy.
- 6Procurement projections (Section 7): Each embassy must annually report procurement and infrastructure needs in their country and assess opportunities and challenges related to PRC financing for those needs; the Under Secretary will summarize these for appropriate bureaus and federal entities, including the DFC.
- 7DFC emphasis (Section 8): Congress expresses that the U.S. should prioritize alternative financing options through the DFC for eligible countries to offset PRC influence, focusing on infrastructure capacity that could serve as an alternative to Belt and Road investments.