Ending China’s Unfair Advantage Act of 2025
The Ending China's Unfair Advantage Act of 2025 would halt U.S. funding for two major international environmental frameworks unless China is reclassified in a way favorable to the United States. Specifically, federal funds could not be used to implement or support the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer until China is no longer defined as a developing country, and funds could not be used to fund operations or meetings of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) until China is included in Annex I (the list of developed countries and economies in transition). The bill relies on presidential certification to Congress that these reclassifications have occurred before funds can be released again. In short, the bill uses U.S. funding as leverage to push for changes in China’s international status within two global environmental regimes, tying funding to redefinitions that determine which countries are considered developing or developed for purposes of those treaties.
Key Points
- 1Prohibition related to the Montreal Protocol: No federal funds may be used to implement the Montreal Protocol or its associated funds until China is removed from the “developing countries” designation per Decision I/12E, as clarified at the first Meeting of the Parties. Certification from the President to Congress is required for funds to resume.
- 2Prohibition related to the UNFCCC: No federal funds may be used to fund operations, meetings, or funds under the UNFCCC or its agreements until China is included in Annex I of the Convention. Certification from the President to Congress is required for funds to resume.
- 3Certification mechanism: The President must certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the required reclassifications have occurred before any funds can be obligated or expended.
- 4Definitions and scope: The act defines the Montreal Protocol, the UNFCCC, and identifies the “appropriate congressional committees” (Senate Foreign Relations and Appropriations; House Foreign Affairs and Appropriations) to receive the required certifications.
- 5Purpose and framing: The bill is framed as a response to what its sponsors view as an unfair advantage for China by maintaining its developing-country status in these forums, using funding blocks as leverage to change classifications.