LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 2309119th CongressIn Committee

Medicare and Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

Introduced: Mar 24, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This bill amends Title XIX of the Social Security Act to strengthen Medicaid provider screening. Starting January 1, 2027, when a provider or supplier enrolls in Medicaid (or revalidates their enrollment) and at least quarterly while they remain enrolled, the state must perform a Death Master File check to determine whether the provider is deceased. The Death Master File is defined by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. The aim is to prevent improper payments and fraud by ensuring that a provider being paid through Medicaid is alive and legitimately enrolled. In effect, the bill adds ongoing, regular verification that Medicaid providers are not deceased, which could help detect and block fraudulent payments or misuse of a provider’s identity. The bill is introduced in the House and would apply specifically to Medicaid enrollment and revalidation processes, with a clear implementation timeline.

Key Points

  • 1Adds “Additional provider screening” by requiring a Death Master File check for Medicaid providers and suppliers.
  • 2Checks must occur as part of enrollment or revalidation of enrollment and must be conducted not less frequently than quarterly during the enrollment period.
  • 3Effective date for the new requirement begins January 1, 2027.
  • 4The Death Master File reference is the definition from section 203(d) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013.
  • 5The change is limited to Medicaid (Title XIX) and does not alter Medicare screening requirements in this text.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Medicaid providers and suppliers; state Medicaid programs responsible for enrollment and revalidation.Secondary group/area affected: Medicaid beneficiaries (patients) by reducing potential improper payments and fraud risk; state health departments and Medicaid agencies tasked with implementing the screening.Additional impacts: Increased administrative and IT work for states to integrate DMF checks into enrollment systems; potential cost implications but possible savings from reduced improper payments; risk of false positives or delays if DMF data are incomplete or lag behind actual status.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025