LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HRES 246119th CongressIn Committee

Impeaching Theodore Chuang, a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Introduced: Mar 24, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This House resolution, H. Res. 246, formally impeaches Theodore Chuang, a judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, for high crimes and misdemeanors. The resolution presents a single article of impeachment that accuses Judge Chuang of a pattern of conduct incompatible with the duties of a federal judge. The core allegations center on a March 18, 2025 memorandum opinion in the case J. Does v. Elon Musk, et al., in which the judge allegedly undermined the President’s Article II authority over foreign policy and national security by issuing a temporary restraining order that required reinstating access to government systems for USAID employees and related entities. The bill also asserts that his actions were arbitrary and capricious and tied to broader claims about USAID’s handling of foreign assistance and national security risks, citing a 2021 GAO report and a November 2024 report about USAID funding meals for al-Qaida–affiliated fighters. The resolution concludes that such conduct shows he is unfit to hold federal office and should be removed from office. The sponsors are Representatives Ogles and Davidson, and the resolution has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Key Points

  • 1Impeachment mechanism: The resolution introduces a formal Article of Impeachment against Judge Theodore Chuang for high crimes and misdemeanors, seeking removal from office if approved.
  • 2Core allegation of misconduct: The Article claims Judge Chuang engaged in a pattern of conduct incompatible with the trust and duties of a federal judge, anchored to his March 18, 2025 memorandum in J. Does v. Elon Musk, et al.
  • 3Separation of powers and Article II concern: The memorandum opinion allegedly marginalized the President’s Article II authority over foreign policy and national security, particularly in relation to USAID and related systems.
  • 4Claims of arbitrariness and national security risk: The Article asserts the judge acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner by mandating system access without properly weighing national security and foreign assistance history, referencing past and more recent USAID concerns (GAO 2021 findings and a 2024 report).
  • 5Remedy sought: The House asserts Judge Chuang is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

Impact Areas

Primary affected group/area: The federal judiciary and its relationship with the executive branch, particularly in areas involving national security and foreign policy authority.Secondary affected group/area: U.S. government agencies cited in the resolution (e.g., USAID) and their governance over foreign aid, subawards, and compliance with regulations intended to prevent terrorism financing.Additional impacts:- Public trust in the judiciary and the impeachment process as a constitutional check.- Potential partisan dynamics in Congress and the Senate if consideration moves beyond the House.- If advanced, the case would proceed to a Senate trial; conviction would require a two-thirds majority in the Senate for removal from office.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025