LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HRES 265119th CongressIn Committee

Condemning the Trump administration for the use of an unauthorized method of communicating highly sensitive or potentially classified information regarding a United States military operation via the messaging platform "Signal".

Introduced: Mar 27, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This House Resolution (H. Res. 265) is a non-binding condemnation of the Trump administration for allegedly using an unauthorized method—specifically the Signal messaging platform—to communicate highly sensitive or potentially classified information about a United States military operation. The measure enumerates a number of named officials who purportedly used Signal and cites concerns over improper handling of classified information, potential exposure to foreign adversaries, and failure to document such information under the Federal Records Act. Although the resolution itself does not create new law, it urges several accountability and oversight actions: review and reform of information-sharing procedures, investigations into potential legal violations, and measures to prevent future inappropriate communications outside approved channels and facilities (notably SCIFs, or Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities). The resolution was introduced in the House on March 27, 2025, with a group of sponsors and was referred to multiple committees (Oversight and Government Reform; Foreign Affairs; Armed Services; Intelligence) to consider provisions within their jurisdiction. It frames the issue as a national security risk and backdrop for broader discussions about recordkeeping, transparency, and proper handling of classified information.

Key Points

  • 1Condemns the administration for potentially exposing highly sensitive or classified information by using an unauthorized communications method (Signal) for a U.S. military operation, naming numerous officials as participants.
  • 2Argues such practices could risk national security and endanger servicemembers by discussing operations in unsecured settings or with non-government parties; references concerns about documentation under the Federal Records Act.
  • 3Calls for a comprehensive review of communication procedures and systems for handling classified information, and for an investigation into all communication methods used by administration members to ensure compliance with proper procedures.
  • 4Demands accountability, including investigations into possible federal law violations and holding violators accountable to the full extent of the law.
  • 5Requires an inquiry into how many times National Security Council or other executive officials used Signal or other unapproved messaging apps, and mandates ensuring communications of highly sensitive information occur inside a SCIF; prohibits outside-SCIF dissemination and warns of removal from office and applicable legal penalties for violations.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Members of the U.S. executive branch and national security officials responsible for handling and transmitting classified information; oversight and disciplinary bodies within Congress (through the referenced committees) and federal agencies (e.g., DoD, State, DNI, NSC).Secondary group/area affected: U.S. military personnel and operations (potential changes in how operational details are communicated and documented); federal records management and compliance programs under the Federal Records Act.Additional impacts: Political and institutional implications, including potential increases in scrutiny of internal communications, shifts toward stricter use of SCIFs and approved channels, and potential implications for transparency and accountability in executive communications. As a resolution, it is a non-binding expression of congressional sentiment that may influence future policy debates and legislative proposals but does not itself enact new law.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025