LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 1255HR 2293119th CongressIn Committee

Cormorant Relief Act of 2025

Introduced: Apr 2, 2025
Chamber Versions:
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Cormorant Relief Act of 2025 would require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to reissue the existing depredation order authorizing the taking (depredation) of double-crested cormorants at aquaculture facilities. The reissued order would be identical to the original depredation order, but it would apply in additional states and to additional entities. Specifically, within one year of enactment, the Secretary must extend the order so it also covers the states of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and it would apply to private lake managers and private pond managers in addition to the groups already covered by the original order. The bill relies on the existing framework from the original order (as of January 1, 2016) and preserves its structure while expanding geographic and stakeholder coverage. In short, the bill seeks to restore and broaden a regulatory tool that allows limited-taking of certain cormorants at aquaculture facilities to reduce economic losses from predation, by duplicating the original depredation order’s terms and extending them to more places and managers.

Key Points

  • 1Defines key terms: lake manager, pond manager, original depredation order, and Secretary (to mean the Interior Secretary via the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service).
  • 2Reissuance deadline: The Secretary must reissue the original depredation order within 1 year after enactment.
  • 3Scope of expansion: The reissued order would apply to the states of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in addition to the states covered by the original order.
  • 4Expanded beneficiaries: In addition to entities covered by the original order, lake managers and pond managers would be authorized to use the depredation order.
  • 5Regulatory parity: The reissued order would be the same as the original order (i.e., identical provisions and conditions), just extended to the new states and new types of managers.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Private aquaculture facility operators and private lake and pond managers in the newly added states, who could rely on the depredation order to allow depredation of double-crested cormorants to protect fish stocks.Secondary group/area affected: State regulatory agencies overseeing licensed lake/pond management, fisheries and wildlife programs, and any entities currently relying on or enforcing the original depredation order.Additional impacts:- Wildlife management and conservation considerations, including alignment with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and existing depredation policies.- Potential economic relief for aquaculture operations facing losses due to cormorant predation.- Possible regulatory and legal considerations for compliance, enforcement, and monitoring across a larger geographic footprint and with more types of managers.- Stakeholder debates between agricultural/fishery interests and wildlife/conservation advocacy groups regarding predator control and bird conservation.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025