A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.
This is a Senate joint resolution (S.J. Res. 33) introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders that would prohibit the United States from approving or implementing a proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel described in Transmittal No. 25-34. The sale in question would include Major Defense Equipment (MDE) such as 35,529 bomb bodies (MK 84 or BLU-117 General Purpose bombs, or a combination) and 4,000 I-2000 Penetrator warheads, along with non-MDE items and related logistics and support services. The resolution uses the Arms Export Control Act’s congressional disapproval mechanism, meaning if enacted, the sale would be blocked unless the Congress changes course or the President signs a different decision. In short, this bill seeks to block a specific package of air-dropped munitions and associated support tied to Israel, asserting Congressional disapproval under the AECA. It would require passage by both chambers and the President’s signature (or possible override of a veto) to become law; otherwise, the sale could proceed.
Key Points
- 1The bill provides for congressional disapproval of a proposed foreign military sale to Israel under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), specifically citing section 36(b)(1) (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)).
- 2It targets Transmittal No. 25-34, submitted to Congress on March 3, 2025, and publicly recorded in the Congressional Record.
- 3The specific items to be blocked are:
- 4- Major Defense Equipment (MDE): 35,529 MK 84 or BLU-117 General Purpose bomb bodies, or a combination of both.
- 5- 4,000 I-2000 Penetrator warheads.
- 6- Associated non-MDE items: spare parts, consumables, accessories, repair/return support, transportation, and engineering/technical/logistics support, plus other related logistics and program support.
- 7The bill was introduced in the Senate on March 10, 2025 by Senator Sanders and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations; it represents a formal expression of disapproval that, if enacted, would prevent the sale from moving forward under current law.
- 8The legislative effect would depend on passage by both chambers and the President’s action (signature or veto; potential override is possible but difficult).