LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 1349119th CongressIn Committee

Ruby Mountains Protection Act

Introduced: Apr 8, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Ruby Mountains Protection Act, introduced in the Senate by Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen, would withdraw specific federal lands in Nevada from use under the mineral leasing laws. Specifically, it targets roughly 309,272 acres of National Forest System land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, and about 39,926 acres of National Wildlife Refuge System land in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge (within Elko and White Pine Counties). The withdrawals are designed to prevent mineral leasing and related activities on these lands, effectively limiting mining development while preserving other potential uses. Key details include: the withdrawals apply “subject to valid existing rights” (so rights already in place before enactment are protected), and lands acquired by the United States after enactment would also be withdrawn. For the Ruby Lake Refuge lands, an exception allows noncommercial refuge management activities by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to proceed. The bill relies on specific maps to define the exact boundaries and areas of withdrawal, which must be publicly available in federal offices.

Key Points

  • 1Withdraws from mineral leasing all National Forest System lands in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict (approximately 309,272 acres) and all Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge lands (approximately 39,926.10 acres) in Nevada, as defined by two referenced maps.
  • 2Applies “subject to valid existing rights,” meaning any mining rights or other rights that exist before enactment are preserved.
  • 3Any land or interest in land acquired by the United States after enactment would be withdrawn in the same manner.
  • 4For the Ruby Lake Refuge lands, the withdrawal does not apply to noncommercial refuge management activities conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  • 5Maps defining the exact withdrawal boundaries are on file and available for public inspection in the relevant federal offices (Forest Service for the NFS lands; Fish and Wildlife Service for the Refuge lands).

Impact Areas

Primary: Federal land users and potential mineral developers, particularly those interested in mining in the Ruby Mountains area; federal land managers (U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) who administer these lands.Secondary: Local communities and economies in Elko and White Pine Counties that could be affected by changes to mineral development potential; conservation organizations and land trust groups focused on protecting natural resources and habitat in the Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake area.Additional impacts: The withdrawal may affect other uses such as recreation, tourism, and grazing only to the extent they are influenced by mineral leasing restrictions; it also preserves broader ecological and habitat protections by precluding mineral development in these sensitive areas.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 31, 2025