LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 2783119th CongressIn Committee

Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act

Introduced: Apr 9, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act would create a special category called “priority manufacturing projects” and set up a framework to fast-track their federal environmental review and approvals. A priority manufacturing project is a U.S. manufacturing facility project costing at least $1 billion and requiring one or more federal approvals listed in the bill. The bill would accelerate processing by waiving certain federal permits (notably Clean Water Act §404 and certain Endangered Species Act approvals), broaden the NEPA review scope to recognize state or tribal reviews as an equivalent, and restrict judicial review of these approvals (with the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit retaining limited jurisdiction over certain challenges). The stated purpose is to bolster the U.S. economy, manufacturing capacity, and national competitiveness, including defense-related sectors, while creating jobs and reducing reliance on foreign production. Critics may view these changes as reducing environmental protections and limiting avenues for legal challenge.

Key Points

  • 1Definition and scope of priority manufacturing projects: Projects in the U.S. for constructing or expanding a manufacturing facility with a project cost of at least $1 billion and that require one or more specified federal approvals.
  • 2Exclusions from certain federal permits: A priority manufacturing project would not be required to obtain permits under the Clean Water Act §404 or certain Endangered Species Act provisions (§7, §9, §10), effectively easing or bypassing some federal environmental permitting.
  • 3NEPA scope and state/tribal equivalence: Amends NEPA to allow lead agencies to treat a State or Tribal environmental review that is judged to be functionally equivalent to NEPA as satisfying the federal review requirement. A “functional equivalence” finding can be satisfied if the state/tribal process considered relevant environmental information and provided public notice about decisions.
  • 4Public participation in equivalence reviews: The functional equivalence determination must reflect that relevant environmental information was considered and the public was informed during decision-making.
  • 5Judicial review limitations: Generally, no court would have jurisdiction to review actions approving priority manufacturing projects under this section. The DC Circuit would have exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to the validity of this section or claims that an action is beyond the authority granted by the act.
  • 6Legislative findings and policy goals: The bill asserts that expedited environmental reviews will strengthen the economy, improve U.S. industrial capacity and technological competitiveness, reduce dependence on foreign manufacturing, and support critical sectors (defense, healthcare, communications) while creating jobs.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Large-scale manufacturing developers and project sponsors planning or building facilities costing $1 billion or more.- Federal agencies issuing environmental approvals for these projects, and state/tribal agencies conducting equivalent reviews.- Local communities and workers near proposed project sites who could experience economic benefits (jobs, increased activity) or environmental and quality-of-life changes due to faster project timelines.Secondary group/area affected- States, tribes, and local governments whose environmental review processes may be relied upon as functionally equivalent to federal NEPA under the bill.- Environmental and public-interest organizations that traditionally participate in federal environmental reviews and may see reduced opportunities for formal challenges.Additional impacts- Environmental protections: Potentially weaker oversight for some large projects due to permit exemptions and limited avenues for judicial review.- Legal and regulatory certainty: Faster timelines and a clearer pathway for major projects, but with variability if state/tribal processes are not deemed functionally equivalent.- Public participation: Could be reduced or streamlined, depending on how state/tribal processes provide notice and consideration of environmental information.- Fiscal and political implications: Could influence federal, state, and local budgets and planning, with possible debates over balancing economic growth against environmental and community concerns.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 31, 2025