LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 3003119th CongressIn Committee

Restore M–44 Act

Introduced: Apr 24, 2025
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Restore M-44 Act would roll back a recent interagency agreement and a funding-era restriction to expand how federal wildlife damage management is carried out. Specifically, it requires the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to rescind a Master Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) about wildlife damage management signed in 2023, effectively nullifying that agreement. It also overturns a prohibition tied to the 2024 appropriations that limited the USDA’s ability to purchase, deploy, and train third parties on M-44 sodium cyanide ejector devices (and related components/1080 pesticide) and removes congressional reporting requirements about implementing that prohibition. In short, the bill would permit broader use of M-44 devices by third parties and reduce Congressional oversight on this activity.

Key Points

  • 1Directs the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to rescind the Master Memorandum of Understanding (BLM-MOU-HQ230-2023-05) related to wildlife damage management, making the MOU void and without force.
  • 2Overturns the prohibition language from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 explanatory statement that restricted the purchase, deployment, and training of third parties to use M-44 sodium cyanide ejector devices and related components (including 1080).
  • 3Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to purchase, deploy, and train third parties on the use of M-44 devices, and to handle components and sodium fluoroacetate (1080).
  • 4States that the Secretary is not required to provide updates to congressional committees about the implementation of the prohibition on M-44 usage.
  • 5Provides the bill’s short title: the Restore M-44 Act.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Federal wildlife management operations and contractors, including the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and the DOI’s wildlife management programs; livestock producers and landowners who rely on predator control.Secondary group/area affected: Wildlife welfare and animal-rights advocates, environmental and public-safety stakeholders concerned about the use of M-44 devices and 1080; state and local agencies involved in wildlife damage management.Additional impacts: Changes in interagency coordination and oversight (reduced congressional reporting on M-44 implementation), potential changes in the pace and method of predator control activities, and broader regulatory and safety considerations around the use of highly toxic substances and delivery devices in wildlife management.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025