Back to all bills
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs
The TRUST Act (Transparency and Responsibility in Upholding Standards in the Judiciary Act) would change how complaints against federal judges are handled when the judge leaves office. Specifically, it says that if a judge who is the subject of a complaint resigns, retires under Chapter 17, or dies, this vacancy cannot be used as a reason to dismiss the complaint or to conclude that action on the complaint is unnecessary. It also requires the investigative committees created to review such complaints to finish their investigation and file a report regardless of the judge’s vacancy. In short, the bill strengthens and preserves the complaint process even when a judge is no longer serving.
Key Points
- 1Vacancy does not end a complaint: A judge’s resignation, retirement, or death cannot be grounds to dismiss the complaint or stop action under the existing complaint process.
- 2Investigations continue: Special committees appointed to examine complaints must complete their investigation and file a report without regard to the judge’s vacancy.
- 3Legislative changes: The changes are implemented by amending 28 U.S.C. § 352 (to add an “Effect of Vacancy” provision) and § 353(c) (to address vacancy effects on investigations and reporting).
- 4Purpose and naming: The measure is titled the “Transparency and Responsibility in Upholding Standards in the Judiciary Act” (TRUST Act), signaling an emphasis on accountability and ongoing oversight.
- 5Scope of impact: Applies to complaints under section 351 and the committees conducting those investigations within the federal judiciary framework.
Impact Areas
Primary affected: Complainants against federal judges, the judges who are subjects of complaints, and the circuit/federal judiciary’s internal oversight structures (e.g., Chief Judges and special committees).Secondary affected: The public and media interested in judicial accountability, as well as the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and related bodies that oversee the judiciary’s complaint process.Additional impacts: May affect resource planning and timelines for complaint investigations, ensuring ongoing accountability even when a judge is no longer in office. Could influence how ongoing or historical allegations are treated after a vacancy (e.g., after death or retirement).
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Nov 18, 2025