LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 3027119th CongressIn Committee

Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025

Introduced: Oct 22, 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Johnson, Ron [R-WI] (R-Wisconsin)
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This bill, formally titled the "Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025," amends the Interstate Income Act of 1959 (Public Law 86-272) to broaden protections for out-of-state businesses against state taxation. Currently, PL 86-272 prohibits states from taxing a business’s net income if its only activity in the state is soliciting orders for tangible goods—like sales calls or catalogs—provided orders are sent outside the state for approval. The bill expands the definition of "solicitation of orders" to include *any activity that facilitates order solicitation*, even if that activity (such as maintaining digital sales platforms, customer service portals, or product databases) also serves other business purposes. This change targets modern e-commerce practices where states have increasingly argued that digital support functions exceed traditional "solicitation" and thus justify taxation. The goal is to reduce compliance burdens for remote sellers and prevent states from imposing income or franchise taxes on businesses with minimal physical presence. The amendment addresses a growing legal gray area where states tax out-of-state companies for activities integral to online sales (e.g., cloud-based order tracking or localized marketing tools), despite PL 86-272’s original intent to shield purely interstate commerce. If enacted, it would clarify that such digitally enabled sales support remains protected, potentially shielding thousands of small and medium-sized businesses from multi-state tax liabilities. However, it does *not* affect sales tax collection rules (governed by the 2018 *Wayfair* decision) or protect businesses with physical operations like warehouses or offices in a state.

Key Points

  • 1Expands "solicitation of orders" to cover *any activity facilitating sales* (e.g., digital storefronts, customer service systems), even if those tools also provide standalone business value beyond solicitation.
  • 2Maintains the core limitation that protection *only applies to sales of tangible goods*—services, digital products, or software-as-a-service remain outside PL 86-272’s scope.
  • 3Explicitly preserves existing rules: Businesses lose protection if they engage in activities beyond solicitation (e.g., inventory storage, installation, or local manufacturing).
  • 4Does not alter state authority to tax businesses with physical presence (e.g., employees or property) or override post-*Wayfair* sales tax obligations.
  • 5Referred to the Senate Finance Committee, signaling focus on federal-state tax jurisdiction and potential alignment with business advocacy groups.

Impact Areas

Remote sellers of tangible goods** (especially e-commerce businesses): Reduced risk of multi-state income/franchise tax audits and liabilities for digital sales support activities.State tax authorities**: Limits ability to claim nexus (taxable connection) based on digital solicitation tools, potentially decreasing state revenue from out-of-state businesses.Small business compliance**: Lowers administrative costs for companies navigating varying state tax laws, though complex digital operations may still face legal challenges.
Generated by Qwen3 235B A22B (qwen) on Oct 28, 2025