LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5745119th CongressIn Committee

Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act

Introduced: Oct 14, 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4] (R-Mississippi)
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This bill, the Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act, would create a formal process to convert certain inactive offshore oil and gas platforms and pipelines into artificial reefs (a “reef in place” approach) to promote fish habitat. It would amend the National Fishing Enhancement Act of 1984 and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to establish definitions, procedures, and timelines for identifying eligible inactive structures, assessing habitat and economic impacts, designating reef planning areas, and obtaining approvals to reef in place. The bill also offers a mechanism for states to assume long-term responsibility and liability for approved artificial reefs in exchange for funding, effectively shifting maintenance duties from the original project operators to state agencies. Additionally, it provides temporary protections against removal orders during key stages of the process to prevent premature decommissioning, while preserving existing regulations governing pipeline abandonment and other decommissioning options. In essence, the bill prioritizes creating reef habitat and potential fisheries benefits by repurposing existing offshore structures, with a structured, regulated process, periodic reporting, and potential state partnerships to manage and maintain reefs. It also maintains safeguards to protect navigational safety and existing regulatory frameworks, and it preserves the option to pursue reefing under other programs.

Key Points

  • 1Creates a formal Reef in Place pathway under the National Fishing Enhancement Act of 1984 to convert eligible inactive offshore oil/gas structures and associated pipelines into artificial reefs, including a comprehensive set of definitions to govern the program.
  • 2Establishes a step-by-step process and timeline: (a) Notice of Intent to Reef; (b) habitat and economic assessments within 180 days (conducted by the Director, a state, or a qualified third party); (c) eligibility determination within 60 days after the assessment; (d) designation of a Reef Planning Area within 90 days of eligibility; (e) approval to Reef in Place within up to three years after eligibility if wells are plugged, hydrocarbons removed, navigational markers installed if needed, liabilities settled or transferred, and the structure deemed reasonably sound.
  • 3Allows State Programs: states may assume responsibility and liability for an Approved Structure in exchange for funding determined by the state (up to 50% of the cost savings to the Applicant, or more with Applicant consent); once accepted, the State would handle ongoing maintenance and liability for the Approved Structure.
  • 4Adds protections under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to pause removal orders during key phases (initial notice, assessment, pending determination, and up to three years after an Eligible Structure determination) with a formal appeals process; exceptions apply if there is substantial and imminent threat to navigational safety or the marine environment.
  • 5Preserves existing decommissioning options and regulatory procedures: pipeline abandonment in place remains governed by existing rules, and reefing would only occur if designated as an Artificial Reef through the new process; requires annual reporting to Congress and relevant agencies with comprehensive mapping of actions taken.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Offshore oil and gas operators and pipeline owners with inactive platforms or pipelines, including lessees and those responsible for decommissioning.- Federal and state agencies involved in natural resources, fisheries, navigation safety, and offshore management (e.g., NOAA, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Department of the Interior, Coast Guard).- States that may participate in State Programs and take over maintenance and liability for approved artificial reefs.Secondary group/area affected- Commercial and recreational fishermen who could benefit from enhanced habitat and potential changes in fishery dynamics.- Coastal and adjacent communities that rely on marine resources and tourism related to reef habitats.Additional impacts- Potential cost savings for operators who reef in place rather than fully remove structures, balanced by funding mechanisms and possible cost-shares with states.- Long-term liability and maintenance responsibilities shifting to states, affecting state budgets and program design.- Navigational safety considerations due to required markers and planning areas, with a governance framework to minimize risks.- Environmental outcomes depend on proper implementation: improved habitat for reef-associated species versus risks if not properly sited or maintained.- Administrative and regulatory workload on agencies (interior, NOAA, state reef programs) due to reporting, assessment, and oversight requirements.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 23, 2025