LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5746119th CongressIn Committee

MARA Act of 2025

Introduced: Oct 14, 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4] (R-Mississippi)
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Marine Aquaculture Research for America Act of 2025 (MARA Act) would create a new Office of Aquaculture within NOAA/NMFS and give it broad authority to study and regulate offshore aquaculture in the United States. The core idea is to establish a formal program of commercial-scale offshore aquaculture through demonstration projects in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ), while also building the workforce and institutional capacity needed to support a domestic offshore aquaculture industry. The bill envisions a phased approach: (1) set up an assessment program to test viability and safety, (2) issue permits for demonstration facilities under strict environmental, wildlife, and public-review standards, (3) develop Aquaculture Centers of Excellence and working waterfront grants to boost innovation and local capacity, and (4) commission independent studies and reporting to evaluate environmental, regulatory, and economic outcomes. The package is designed to expand domestic seafood production, support coastal communities and traditional fishery workers, and reduce the U.S. seafood trade deficit, all within a regulated, science-based framework. Key elements include a dedicated Office of Aquaculture, a formal offshore aquaculture assessment program tied to demonstration projects, a structured permit process with public involvement and interagency coordination, workforce and regional networking programs, and required studies and annual reporting to inform future policy and practice.

Key Points

  • 1Establishment of an Office of Aquaculture within NOAA/NMFS with regional presence and clear duties to coordinate, monitor, and promote offshore aquaculture, including collaboration with Sea Grant and other research programs and ensuring resources for implementation.
  • 2Creation of an assessment program for offshore aquaculture through commercial-scale demonstration projects in the EEZ, to examine facility designs, technologies, environmental impacts, wildlife interactions, and navigation impacts, using best available science and stakeholder input; a public, NAS, and GAO-supported process to report findings.
  • 3A robust permit framework for demonstration projects (Section 202) requiring: uses of native or historically naturalized species; design safeguards to minimize escapes and wildlife entanglement; compliance with key environmental laws (Clean Water Act, ESA, MMPA, NEPA); partnerships with land-grant universities, historically Black colleges and universities, 1994 Institutions, or sea grant colleges; public notice and comment with protections for specially affected coastal jurisdictions; and a 10-year permit term with possible renewal, plus a structured process for modification, deferral, or denial of permits and a deemed-approval mechanism if agencies miss deadlines.
  • 4Implementation of workforce development and economic support programs (Title III), including grants for marketing, education and training in offshore aquaculture, establishment of Aquaculture Centers of Excellence, regional networks of expertise, and an aquaculture database to catalog research, technologies, monitoring methods, and advisory recommendations; emphasis on regional extension, outreach, and integration with existing seafood industries.
  • 5Studies and reporting requirements (Title IV) to evaluate offshore aquaculture viability and regulatory viability, with mandated studies by the National Academies and the GAO, plus ongoing reporting by demonstration-project owners on production, environment, socioeconomics, and impacts on coastal communities; emergency reporting provisions for interactions with protected species.

Impact Areas

Primary groups/areas affected- Aquaculture stakeholders (facility owners/operators, investors, contractors) and the seafood industry seeking to expand domestic offshore production.- Coastal states and specially affected coastal jurisdictions (including Indian Tribes and Indigenous communities) whose lands and waters may be impacted by offshore facilities and who have a formal consultative role in permitting.- Traditional fishery participants and workers, including those impacted by COVID-19 or other disasters, who may benefit from new jobs and diversification via Aquaculture Centers of Excellence and workforce grants.Secondary groups/areas affected- Federal and state regulators and permitting agencies; wildlife and environmental protection programs; navigation and water-use planners; Native Hawaiian organizations and other tribal/indigenous entities.Additional impacts- Environmental and wildlife considerations, including potential impacts on endangered species, marine mammals, habitat, and water quality; requires adherence to environmental laws and best practices intended to minimize escapes, entanglements, antibiotic use, and pollution.- Regional economic development and coastal community resilience through working waterfront grants and regional expert networks; potential shifts in local industry dynamics and supply chains for seafood.- Information and transparency through an offshore aquaculture database, public reporting, and independent studies to inform ongoing policy decisions and potential regulatory adjustments.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 23, 2025