LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5704119th CongressIn Committee

Repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013

Introduced: Oct 8, 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (R-Kentucky)
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

This bill, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013 and to impose stricter controls on the U.S. government’s foreign information programs to prevent domestic propagandization. It would roll back changes that allowed some U.S. citizens to access U.S. government-produced foreign information materials, and it would reimpose substantial safeguards: foreign materials would be prepared and disseminated abroad only through official channels, with limited domestic access (primarily for oversight and archival purposes). The bill also strengthens archival rules, requiring a 20-year delay before materials produced for abroad dissemination can be publicly available domestically, and imposes labeling and cost-recovery requirements when materials are released. In short, the bill tightens the boundary between U.S. government foreign information activities and domestic audiences, increases the role of the Archivist in controlling access, and limits opportunities for domestic dissemination or use of such materials, while preserving a narrow path for congressional oversight and factual information transmission.

Key Points

  • 1Repeal of Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013: The bill repeals the 2013 modernization and reinstates stricter restrictions on domestic access and dissemination of materials produced for foreign audiences.
  • 2General authorization for abroad dissemination with platform limits: The Secretary of State and the US Agency for Global Media may disseminate information abroad through official channels, but may not use social media accounts, websites, or podcasts outside official platforms for foreign dissemination.
  • 3Domestic review and oversight carve-out: Materials produced for foreign dissemination must be available in English for examination in the United States by U.S. press associations, newspapers, radio, and Members of Congress, but such materials may not be disseminated domestically except for congressional oversight.
  • 4Prohibition on domestic propaganda: No funds may be used to influence U.S. public opinion or propagandize domestically; materials may be reviewed domestically but cannot be distributed or repurposed for domestic audiences.
  • 5Archival and labeling requirements: Materials must be archived 20 years after initial foreign dissemination (or after preparation if never disseminated), with clear identifiers noting the producing agency, original foreign origin, and purpose. Fees may be charged to cover archival costs and these fees go to the National Archives Trust Fund.
  • 6Additional legal framework: Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act (FY 1986-87) is amended to ban domestic distribution of program materials, with a narrow exception for providing factual information about operations, policies, or programs, and for inquiries from the public or media, while preserving exceptions for MECEA programs and public inquiries.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- U.S. government foreign information programs (State Department, USAGM and its networks such as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Liberty, etc.) and the agencies administering international broadcasting and public diplomacy.- U.S. journalists, congressional staff, and researchers who seek access to foreign-distributed materials for oversight, reporting, or analysis.Secondary group/area affected- U.S. taxpayers and the general public, who may experience reduced access to foreign-information materials produced by the U.S. government and changes in how such content is encountered domestically.- Archivists and libraries, due to updated archival requirements, fees, and long lead times before materials can be released domestically.Additional impacts- Transparency and public diplomacy: The bill would tighten the boundary between foreign information outreach and domestic audiences, potentially reducing the public’s ability to review or critique U.S. government foreign communications.- Compliance and costs: New archiving, labeling, and fee requirements could increase administrative workload and costs for the State Department and USAGM.- Legal and constitutional considerations: The bill sets a formal framework for restricting domestic distribution of foreign materials, which could influence debates over government communications, public diplomacy, and the handling of information intended for foreign audiences.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 23, 2025