Developing and Advancing Innovative Learning Models
The Developing and Advancing Innovative Learning Models (H.R. 3250) would create a federal grant program to develop, test, evaluate, and expand innovative learning models (ILMs) in elementary, middle, and high schools. The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) would lead activities, providing development grants, research grants, and an evaluation framework to advance ILMs—defined as comprehensive, integrated programs that combine instructional design, pedagogy, operations, and technology—not just standalone tools. The bill emphasizes evidence-based approaches while allowing non-randomized studies, requires strong data privacy protections, and seeks to identify and address federal and state barriers to adoption. In parallel, Title II would provide state and local grants to accelerate adoption and scale of ILMs through a formula-based system, with local implementation supported by partnerships and a focus on equity and student outcomes. The overall aim is to spur innovation in learning models, build the field’s capacity to implement them, and generate data to inform policy and practice. The program would fund multiple stages: early-phase development and feasibility testing; mid-phase implementation and rigorous evaluation (when feasible using administrative data); and expansion to replicate and sustain impacts. An ongoing, independent evaluation would measure program effectiveness, and annual reporting to Congress and the public would share grant activity, outcomes, and policy barriers. Subgrants to local districts would emphasize collaboration with teachers and communities, and address diverse student needs, including students with disabilities, English learners, and at-risk students. The bill includes guardrails to ensure quality, privacy, neutrality, and avoidance of partisan influence.
Key Points
- 1Establishes a comprehensive grant program (Title I) to develop, test, evaluate, replicate, and scale innovative learning models, with a 6-year maximum grant duration and a tiered funding approach (early-phase development, mid-phase implementation/evaluation, expansion/replication).
- 2Defines "innovative learning model" as a holistic program that bundles instructional design, pedagogy, operations, and technology, is created with input from school communities, and can target entire schools or specific subjects or functions (e.g., social-emotional support).
- 3Requires evidence-informed funding standards, but explicitly allows non-randomized study designs; mandates peer review by practitioners and experts; emphasizes data privacy and secular, neutral evaluation free of bias.
- 4Title II creates formula grants to states and subgrants to local educational agencies (LEAs) to adopt and expand ILMs; allocation based on population and poverty measures, with a minimum distribution per LEA and a strong emphasis on required planning, collaboration, and equitable access.
- 5Local uses of funds may involve partnerships with for-profit/nonprofit entities or higher education institutions/tribal organizations; activities must address the needs of all students, including those with disabilities, English learners, and at-risk students; funds must supplement, not supplant, existing financing.