LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 3432119th CongressIntroduced

TDS Research Act of 2025

Introduced: May 15, 2025
Healthcare
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Trump Derangement Syndrome Research Act of 2025 would require the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct or support research on what the bill calls Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). Using existing NIH programs (notably the National Institute of Mental Health and other relevant institutes), the bill aims to study the origins, manifestations, and long-term effects of TDS, including identifying initial cases, understanding long-term psychological and social impacts, analyzing contributing factors (such as media exposure and political polarization), and exploring potential interventions or coping strategies. The NIH would collaborate with other federal agencies, academic institutions, and relevant organizations, and would annually report to Congress on progress, findings, and recommendations. A statutory definition of TDS is included in the bill.

Key Points

  • 1Establishes a mandate for NIH to conduct or support research on Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) within its existing programs and authorities.
  • 2Research objectives include identifying initial emergence or index cases, assessing long-term psychological, social, or behavioral impacts, examining contributing factors, and exploring interventions or coping strategies.
  • 3Requires collaboration with other federal agencies, academic institutions, and relevant organizations as appropriate.
  • 4Imposes an annual reporting obligation to Congress (initial report within two years of enactment and then annually) detailing progress, findings, and recommendations for further research or public health actions.
  • 5Provides a formal definition of TDS as a behavioral or psychological phenomenon involving intense emotional or cognitive reactions to Donald J. Trump, his actions, or his public presence.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: NIH and its research community (including the National Institute of Mental Health) and other federal scientists who would conduct or supervise TDS-related research.Secondary group/area affected: Public health and mental health policy stakeholders, as the findings could inform public health strategies or interventions related to media influence and political polarization.Additional impacts: Potential implications for political discourse, media studies, and education about media effects; possible concerns about stigmatizing political opinions or labeling political disagreement as a medical condition; allocation of federal research funding to study a politically charged topic.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 3, 2025