LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 1994119th CongressIn Committee

Protecting Community Television Act

Introduced: Jun 9, 2025
Technology & Innovation
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Protecting Community Television Act would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to alter how the term “franchise fee” is defined. The bill changes the definitional language in section 622(g)(1) by replacing the word “includes” with “means” and by adding the phrase “other monetary” before “assessment.” In practical terms, this shifts the term from a descriptive list to a formal, stand-alone definition and broadens the scope to cover additional monetary charges that governments may levy on cable systems as part of franchise arrangements. The aim appears to be clarifying and potentially expanding what counts as a franchise fee, which can affect how such charges are calculated, reported, or capped under existing franchise fee provisions. By tightening and broadening the definitional scope, the bill could influence how local governments assess payments from cable operators and how those payments are treated in relation to franchise fee caps and revenue-sharing obligations. The name of the measure—“Protecting Community Television Act”—suggests a focus on preserving funding mechanisms for community-access television (PEG) through franchise-related charges, though the text provided here stops at redefining franchise fee and does not specify new funding mandates or distribution rules.

Key Points

  • 1The bill is titled the Protecting Community Television Act.
  • 2It modifies the definition of “franchise fee” in the Communications Act.
  • 3The change uses “means” instead of “includes,” making the term a defined concept rather than a descriptive list.
  • 4It adds the phrase “other monetary” before “assessment,” broadening which charges count as franchise fees.
  • 5No other provisions are included in the text provided; only the definitional change is enacted.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Cable operators and the entities that grant or regulate cable franchise agreements (local governments and their agencies), as well as PEG/community television funding mechanisms that rely on franchise revenues.Secondary group/area affected: Consumers/taxpayers who may be affected indirectly if broader franchise-fee definitions influence fee levels, revenue sharing, or service pricing.Additional impacts: The change could affect regulatory clarity and enforcement around franchise fees, potentially increasing the scope of charges counted toward the franchise-fee base and influencing negotiations between operators and municipalities. It may also impact the financial planning of municipalities seeking to fund community access channels.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 7, 2025