Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act
The Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act would dramatically reshape how state and local authorities interact with federal immigration enforcement. It would require jurisdictions that comply with DHS detainers to be treated as DHS agents, with the same authority as federal officers for actions taken to fulfill those detainers. It also provides liability protections for states and localities that act in compliance with detainers, while preserving a limit on immunity for rights violations. The bill would define “sanctuary jurisdictions” as those that prohibit or restrict sharing immigration status information or complying with DHS detainer requests, with a carve-out for policies that protect victims or witnesses. Importantly, it would bar sanctuary jurisdictions from receiving several categories of federal funding (economic development, community development, and related training) and would trigger refund and reallocation of funds if a jurisdiction is deemed sanctuary. The changes would take effect October 1, 2025. In short, the bill ties local or state cooperation with DHS detainers to federal agency status and liability rules, and it uses funding eligibility as a lever to push jurisdictions to align with federal immigration enforcement practices.
Key Points
- 1Authority to cooperate and liability protections for localities complying with DHS detainers
- 2- States/localities that comply with DHS detainers (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) would be treated as DHS agents and could perform DHS-like actions in detainer cases.
- 3- Actions taken to comply with detainers would carry DHS-like authority, with liability protections for the jurisdiction and its officials, and the United States would be substituted as the defendant in related civil actions; remedies would align with federal law.
- 4- Immunity would not apply if civil or constitutional rights are knowingly violated.
- 5Sanctuary jurisdiction definition and exceptions
- 6- Establishes sanctuary jurisdictions as those with policies restricting sharing immigration status information or complying with DHS detainer requests.
- 7- Excludes from this designation any locality that does not share information or comply with detainer requests when the individual is a crime victim or witness.
- 8Ineligibility for federal grants and funding
- 9- Sanctuary jurisdictions would be barred from receiving certain Economic Development Administration grants (public works, planning, supplementary grants, and training/technical assistance).
- 10- CDBG (Community Development Block Grants) funding would be conditioned on not being a sanctuary jurisdiction and not becoming one during grant periods.
- 11- New protections within Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act would prohibit obligating or expending funds to sanctuary jurisdictions and provide mechanisms to return and reallocate those funds to non-sanctuary jurisdictions.
- 12Broad impact on federal funding programs
- 13- The funding restrictions apply across multiple grant programs administered by agencies like EDA and HUD, with specific provisions on grant eligibility, non-entitlement areas, and reallocation rules.
- 14Effective date
- 15- The new provisions would take effect on October 1, 2025.