LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 3978119th CongressIn Committee

Nuclear REFUEL (Recycling Efficient Fuels Utilizing Expedited Licensing) Act

Introduced: Jun 12, 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5] (R-Ohio)
Environment & ClimateInfrastructure
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

Nuclear REFUEL Act would amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to change how certain reprocessing devices are treated under U.S. nuclear regulation. Specifically, it seeks to exclude equipment or devices that reprocess spent nuclear fuel in a way that does not separate plutonium from other transuranic elements from being classified as a “production facility.” In other words, such equipment would not count as a production facility under current law, which currently governs licensing and oversight for production facilities. The bill’s title suggests a goal of expedited licensing for “recycling efficient fuels,” though the text itself focuses on creating a regulatory carve-out rather than detailing new licensing procedures. The bill was introduced in the House on June 12, 2025, by Rep. Latta (with Rep. Peters) and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Key Points

  • 1The bill amends Section 11(v) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 by changing the definition of “production facility.”
  • 2It adds an explicit carve-out for equipment that reprocesses spent nuclear fuel in a manner that does not separate plutonium from other transuranic elements.
  • 3The effect is to exclude such non-plutonium-separating reprocessing equipment from being treated as a “production facility” under the Act, potentially reducing licensing requirements for that equipment.
  • 4The short title is the Nuclear REFUEL Act, indicating a goal of recycling-efficient fuels and expedited licensing, though the bill text focuses on the definitional carve-out rather than detailing a new licensing process.
  • 5Legislative status: Introduced in the House on June 12, 2025 by Rep. Latta (for himself and Rep. Peters); referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Developers and operators of reprocessing technologies that handle spent nuclear fuel without separating plutonium, and entities seeking to deploy such equipment.- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other safety/regulatory agencies, which oversee licensing and oversight of nuclear facilities. The bill would change what counts as a “production facility” for regulatory purposes.Secondary group/area affected- Nuclear industry stakeholders involved in fuel recycling and advanced fuel cycles, who may experience changes in licensing timelines or regulatory posture.- Nonproliferation and security stakeholders, since the definition of what constitutes a production facility relates to safeguards and plutonium handling.Additional impacts- Regulatory clarity and potential shift in licensing burden for certain reprocessing equipment; possible implications for safety, safeguards, and oversight frameworks even if a device is not considered a production facility.- Investment and R&D signals for recycling technologies, given the stated aim of expediting licensing for certain fuel recycling approaches.- Possible need for follow-on guidance or rules to specify how such excluded devices would be regulated under other parts of the Atomic Energy Act or related statutes.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 7, 2025