LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 2705119th CongressIn Committee

Keep Violent Criminals Off Our Streets Act

Introduced: Sep 4, 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN] (R-Tennessee)
Civil Rights & Justice
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Keep Violent Criminals Off Our Streets Act would change federal funding rules for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants (JAG) program. Starting with the fiscal year after enactment, the Attorney General would be barred from awarding, renewing, or extending JAG funds to any state or unit of local government that has a policy or law substantially limiting cash bail as a condition for every individual charged with certain serious offenses. The bill defines a set of “covered offenses” (including violent and sexual offenses like murder, rape, carjacking, robbery, burglary, assault, and offenses that promote public disorder such as looting or rioting). In short, jurisdictions that limit cash bail for people charged with these offenses would become ineligible for JAG funding.

Key Points

  • 1Creates a funding condition: States and localities that substantially limit cash bail for individuals charged with covered offenses would be ineligible for JAG grants.
  • 2Covered offenses defined: Includes violent or sexual crimes (e.g., murder, rape, sexual assault, carjacking, robbery, burglary, assault) and offenses that promote disorder (e.g., looting, vandalism, rioting, fleeing from law enforcement).
  • 3Effective date: The prohibition applies to the fiscal year beginning after enactment of the bill and each subsequent year.
  • 4Federal grant mechanics: The prohibition applies to awarding, renewing, or extending grants under the JAG subpart administered by the Department of Justice.
  • 5Purpose/intent: The sponsor frame is to “keep violent criminals off our streets” by tying access to federal crime-prevention funding to support for cash bail rather than bail reform policies.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- States and units of local government that have policies or laws limiting cash bail; they could lose access to JAG funding if their policies are deemed to substantially limit cash bail for the covered offenses.Secondary group/area affected- Agencies and jurisdictions that administer JAG-funded programs (law enforcement, courts, victim services, community programs), which would be affected by changes in grant eligibility and potential funding reductions or shifts.- Individuals charged with covered offenses in those jurisdictions (potentially facing different bail practices due to funding restrictions).Additional impacts- Federal funding landscape: Changes to how JAG funds are allocated could redirect or reduce federal support for crime-prevention and policing programs in bail-reform jurisdictions.- Administrative/implementation considerations: How “substantially limits cash bail” is defined and assessed could require new federal guidance and reporting by states/localities.- Policy and legal considerations: Could interact with ongoing bail reform debates and raise questions about state sovereignty and constitutional considerations surrounding bail practices, though the bill uses funding conditions rather than mandating specific bail laws.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 8, 2025