LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5273119th CongressIntroduced

Broadband Competition and Efficient Deployment Act

Introduced: Sep 10, 2025
InfrastructureTechnology & Innovation
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Broadband Competition and Efficient Deployment Act would exempt certain telecom siting projects from federal environmental and historic preservation review. Specifically, it says that a federal authorization for a collocation project—placing, constructing, or modifying a telecommunications facility on eligible existing infrastructure—shall not be treated as a major federal action under NEPA (which typically triggers environmental reviews) or as an undertaking under NHPA (which triggers historic preservation reviews). The bill defines what counts as a “covered project,” what constitutes “eligible support infrastructure,” and clarifies that the FCC (the Commission) administers these rules. The overarching aim is to speed up the deployment of broadband infrastructure by reducing the federal review burden, thereby potentially increasing competition and rapid access to high-speed services.

Key Points

  • 1Exempts certain collocation projects from major federal action NEPA reviews and from NHPA Section 106-style undertakings.
  • 2Applies to projects for placement, construction, or modification of a telecommunications facility on eligible support infrastructure when a federal FCC permit or approval is required or under FCC jurisdiction.
  • 3Defines “covered project,” “eligible support infrastructure,” and other terms (including FCC/Commission, federal authorization, Indian Tribes, and telecommunications services) to determine what falls under the exemption.
  • 4The Commission (FCC) is the governing body referenced for regulatory authority and interpretation.
  • 5Intended effect is to accelerate broadband deployment and increase competition by reducing federal review timeframes for collocation projects.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected- Broadband service providers, tower/colocation developers, and construction firms working on telecommunications facilities.- Localities and states where eligible infrastructure sits, since federal reviews could be streamlined for eligible projects.- Consumers in areas lacking robust broadband, who may benefit from faster deployment and more competition.Secondary group/area affected- Environmental advocacy groups and historical preservation organizations concerned about potential reductions in NEPA and NHPA reviews.- Indian Tribes and tribal governments, though the bill’s NHPA exemption applies to federal undertakings; tribal engagement processes may shift in emphasis or scope.- Federal agencies beyond the FCC that handle environmental or historic-preservation reviews integrated with telecom permitting.Additional impacts- Potentially faster project timelines and lower federal regulatory costs for providers, possibly improving broadband access timelines.- Possible trade-offs in environmental and historic preservation safeguards, raising concerns about oversight and long-term impacts.- Interaction with state, local, and tribal permitting: while federal review may be streamlined, state/local processes and requirements could still apply, leading to a mix of accelerated and non-accelerated steps at different government levels.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 2, 2025