LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5352119th CongressIntroduced

To prohibit Federal funding for entities that employ individuals who condone and celebrate political violence and domestic terrorism, and for other purposes.

Introduced: Sep 15, 2025
Defense & National SecurityLabor & Employment
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

H.R. 5352 would prohibit the use of federal funds for any entity that employs individuals who condone and celebrate political violence and domestic terrorism, with the definition of that term drawn from 18 U.S.C. 2331. In other words, if an entity hires people who engage in or celebrate acts of political violence or domestic terrorism as defined by federal law, that entity would be ineligible to receive federal funding. The text provided covers only this funding prohibition and does not specify exceptions, enforcement procedures, or implementation details. The bill was introduced in the House by Mr. Van Orden on September 15, 2025 and was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The current text defines the prohibited funding at a broad level and links the standard to the existing federal statute on domestic terrorism.

Key Points

  • 1Prohibition: No federal funds may be obligated, expended, or disbursed to any entity that employs individuals who condone and celebrate political violence and domestic terrorism (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2331).
  • 2Scope of funds: The ban applies to all federal funding, including obligations, expenditures, and disbursements.
  • 3Definition reference: The term “domestic terrorism” is to be interpreted by the definition in 18 U.S.C. 2331.
  • 4Legislative status: Introduced in the House on September 15, 2025 by Mr. Van Orden; referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  • 5Gaps in the text: The section provided does not specify any exemptions, safe harbors, appeal rights, verification procedures, or enforcement mechanisms.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Entities that receive federal funding (such as government contractors, universities, research institutions, nonprofits, and state/local governments). If these entities employ individuals who meet the defined criteria, they could become ineligible for federal funds.Secondary group/area affected: Individuals employed by those entities (potentially affected by changes in employment practices or funding stability), and the institutions’ administrative staff responsible for compliance and vetting.Additional impacts:- Administrative burden and compliance costs for federal grantmakers and recipient institutions (screening of personnel and vetting processes).- Potential legal and civil liberties considerations, including concerns about due process, scope of "condone and celebrate," and how to assess such behavior.- Possible chilling effects or political climate concerns if organizations self-censor or restructure hiring practices to avoid jeopardizing funding.- Unclear enforcement mechanisms and remedies may lead to questions about how to resolve disputes or apply the prohibition in practice.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 2, 2025