LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5393119th CongressIntroduced

Southern Arizona Protection Act

Introduced: Sep 16, 2025
Immigration
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The Southern Arizona Protection Act is a bill that would eliminate the Ironwood Forest National Monument designation and prevent future monument designations in that southern Arizona area unless Congress explicitly authorizes them. Specifically, it nullifies Presidential Proclamation 7320, which established the Ironwood Forest National Monument in 2000, and prohibits any extension or new designation of national monuments in the geographic area shown on the June 12, 2000 Ironwood Forest map without an act of Congress. In effect, the bill shifts the decision-making authority for this land from the executive branch (the President) to Congress, requiring explicit legislative action to protect additional lands or modify protections in that area.

Key Points

  • 1Nullifies Presidential Proclamation 7320, which established the Ironwood Forest National Monument (2000).
  • 2Prohibits any extension or establishment of national monuments within the Ironwood Forest area unless Congress passes a law authorizing it.
  • 3Uses the June 12, 2000 map titled “Ironwood Forest National Monument” as the geographic reference for the restrictions.
  • 4Requires explicit authorization by Congress for future monument designations in this area, effectively limiting executive branch discretion.
  • 5The bill is titled the “Southern Arizona Protection Act,” introduced in the 119th Congress and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Federal land management in southern Arizona, particularly the Ironwood Forest area; agencies like the Department of the Interior and land-management bodies; local communities relying on current land-use designations.Secondary group/area affected: Environmental and conservation organizations advocating for protection of protected lands; Native American tribes with interests in the region’s cultural and archaeological resources; recreational users and tourism-related businesses.Additional impacts: Potential changes in land-use planning, mining or mineral development interests, grazing and ranching practices, and legal/political processes required to restore or expand protections (through Congress rather than executive action).
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 2, 2025