LegisTrack
Back to all bills
S 2813119th CongressIntroduced

FIRE Act

Introduced: Sep 16, 2025
Financial Services
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

The FIRE Act, introduced in the Senate, would prohibit capacity-based restrictions on firearm magazines at both the federal and state/local levels. It would amend 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44 to (1) bar federal regulators from enforcing any rule that limits magazine capacity, (2) render state or local laws that limit or penalize magazines based on capacity ineffective, and (3) define key terms such as “firearm magazine” and “capacity.” The act defines a magazine as either fixed or detachable storage that feeds ammunition into a firearm, and defines capacity as the number of rounds the magazine can hold. The amendments would take effect 30 days after enactment. The bill is titled the Freedom from Improper Regulation and Enforcement Act (FIRE Act) and was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Risch (with several cosponsors).

Key Points

  • 1Federal prohibition on capacity-based regulation: Adds a new provision to 18 U.S.C. § 926(d) stating that federal officers cannot prescribe or enforce any regulation that restricts magazines based on capacity.
  • 2State/local prohibition: Amends 18 U.S.C. § 927 to preempt state and local laws that impose capacity-based restrictions on magazines, stating such laws “shall have no force or effect.”
  • 3Definitions: Expands 18 U.S.C. § 921(a) to define “firearm magazine” (fixed or detachable device storing and feeding ammunition) and “capacity” (the number of rounds the magazine can hold).
  • 4Short title: Establishes the act as the Freedom from Improper Regulation and Enforcement Act (FIRE Act).
  • 5Effective date: Applies to conduct occurring on or after 30 days after enactment.

Impact Areas

Primary group/area affected: Firearm owners and users; magazine manufacturers and retailers. The law would limit the ability to regulate or ban magazines based on how many rounds they hold.Secondary group/area affected: State and local governments, law enforcement, and regulatory agencies. Preemption could limit local public safety laws that set magazine capacity limits.Additional impacts:- Legal and constitutional implications: The bill would create a stronger federal preemption against capacity-based regulation, potentially triggering challenges or affecting ongoing state/regional policies that hinge on magazine capacity restrictions.- Public safety and policy debates: The measure would shift the regulatory landscape in favor of unlimited capacity magazines from the perspective of owners and manufacturers, while opponents may view it as reducing tools to address gun violence or mass casualty incidents.- Compliance and enforcement: If enacted, agencies would adjust enforcement practices to align with the prohibition on capacity-based limits, and states/localities would need to revisit any current capacity-based laws.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 2, 2025