To ensure the alignment of economic and foreign policies, to position the Department of State to reflect that economic security is national security, and for other purposes.
This bill seeks to fundamentally align U.S. economic and foreign policy by placing economics at the center of diplomacy within the State Department. It creates a new top-level official, the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, who would oversee a broad portfolio including economic growth, energy, technology policy, science and space, critical minerals, natural resources, sanctions, and related duties. The bill also establishes a Chief Economist and several new senior offices (e.g., Assistant Secretaries for Commercial Diplomacy, Water/Environment/Space Affairs, Energy Security and Diplomacy, and Sanctions Policy) and corresponding bureaus to house specialized functions. In addition, it creates a Subnational Diplomacy Office to engage U.S. states and localities in foreign policy and investment efforts. The proposal would reallocate and expand authority and resources within the Department of State (and modify related programs such as the CHIPS Act’s International Technology Security and Innovation Fund) to reflect that economic security is national security. The overall aim is to institutionalize a coordinated, economics-focused approach to foreign policy—strengthening supply chains, promoting U.S. trade and investment abroad, advancing energy and mineral security, coordinating sanctions policy, and integrating environmental, space, and technology considerations into diplomacy. If enacted, the bill would entail significant organizational changes, expanded roles for several undersecretaries and assistants, new reporting requirements, and targeted funding for the 2026-2027 fiscal years.
Key Points
- 1Establishment of an Under Secretary for Economic Affairs within the Department of State, with broad duties spanning economic growth, energy, technology policy, science, space policy, critical minerals, water/environment, natural resources, and sanctions, plus duties designated by the Secretary.
- 2Creation of a Chief Economist and an Office of the Chief Economist to analyze and forecast the economic dimensions of diplomacy, produce a biennial/quadrennial report on international economic strategy, and coordinate with other bureaus.
- 3Creation of new senior leadership and bureaus:
- 4- Assistant Secretary for Commercial Diplomacy (trade/investment promotion, international finance, development, debt relief, and related duties).
- 5- Bureau of Commercial Diplomacy (head by the Assistant Secretary).
- 6- Assistant Secretary for Water, Environment, and Space Affairs (oceans, environment, outer space, natural resources, etc.) and Bureau of Water, Environment, and Space Affairs.
- 7- Assistant Secretary for Energy Security and Diplomacy (international energy policy, critical minerals, supply chains, and interagency coordination).
- 8- Bureau of Energy Security and Diplomacy (head by the Assistant Secretary).
- 9- Assistant Secretary for Sanctions Policy (development and implementation of sanctions policy, enforcement coordination, anti-money-laundering/illicit finance efforts, and related duties) and Bureau of Sanctions Policy.
- 10Subnational diplomacy: Creation of a Office of Subnational Diplomacy to work with U.S. states, counties, cities, and towns to attract foreign investment, counter foreign malign influence, and support foreign-policy priorities at the local level.
- 11Administration and funding: Provisions authorizing appropriations for 2026-2027 to support the new Under Secretary, Chief Economist, and the various Assistant Secretaries and Bureaus; reallocation of the International Technology Security and Innovation Fund’s oversight to be coordinated through the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs.
- 12Crosswalks and references: The bill would rename or reinterpret several existing offices and roles (e.g., Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment) to align with the new structure and terminology.
- 13First appointments: The current holder of the corresponding pre-existing position would transition to the new title (subject to Senate approval), signaling a managed reorganization rather than an abrupt replacement.