LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5654119th CongressIn Committee

To provide for interim appropriations for the District of Columbia courts and related agencies with respect to any fiscal year for which appropriations are not otherwise provided for such courts and agencies.

Introduced: Sep 30, 2025
Sponsor: Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] (D-District of Columbia)
Economy & Taxes
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

H.R. 5654, introduced by Representative Norton in the 119th Congress, would create a temporary, or interim, funding mechanism to keep District of Columbia courts and related criminal-justice agencies operating in any fiscal year when those federal payments are funded in the current year but not in the next year. If a DC court-related federal payment is provided in one year but not the following year, the bill would authorize the U.S. Treasury to place interim funds in the next year at the previous year’s operating rate, sourced from money “not otherwise appropriated.” These interim funds would cover the specified federal payments described in the bill and would be limited to bridging the gap until a new appropriation is enacted. If Congress later enacts a new appropriation for these payments (or a general DC appropriation that does not include them), the interim expenditures would be charged to that new appropriation and would cease once the new appropriation is enacted. The payments covered align with those provided in the DC Appropriations Act, 2024, and continued by subsequent continuing acts. In short, the bill is a stopgap funding mechanism to prevent interruptions in funding for DC courts and related criminal-justice agencies when annual federal funding for those payments is not enacted in a subsequent year.

Key Points

  • 1Interim appropriations trigger: If a federal payment to DC courts or related agencies is funded in a current year but not in the next year, the bill authorizes interim funding for the next year to cover that payment.
  • 2Funding source and terms: Interim funds would come from money in the U.S. Treasury that is not otherwise appropriated, at the operating rate and under the terms and conditions of the previous year.
  • 3Interaction with later appropriations: If a new appropriation for the federal payments (or a general DC appropriation without that payment) is enacted during the same fiscal year, the interim expenditures would be charged to the new appropriation, and the interim funds would cease once the new appropriation is enacted.
  • 4Scope of payments covered: The federal payments described include:
  • 5Purpose and effect: The measure is designed to maintain continuity of crucial DC court-related operations by bridging funding gaps, ensuring ongoing operations while Congress acts on future appropriations.

Impact Areas

Primary: District of Columbia Courts and related agencies (including DC Courts, CSOSA, DC Public Defender Service, the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, and judicial commissions) and the individuals relying on these services (e.g., judges, public defenders, defendants, and the general public served by the DC criminal-justice system).Secondary: Federal taxpayers and the U.S. Treasury (as funding would come from unrestricted Treasury funds if an interim period is needed), and the broader DC resident population affected by the continuity of court operations.Additional impacts: This mechanism could affect the timing and sequencing of DC-related appropriations, influence discussions around federal funding for DC criminal-justice infrastructure, and interact with the DC local budget process by providing a federal stopgap rather than a DC-only funding solution. It also clarifies that interim funds are temporary and must yield to newly enacted appropriations.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 16, 2025