LegisTrack
Back to all bills
HR 5652119th CongressIn Committee

Wildfire Recovery Act

Introduced: Sep 30, 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2] (D-Colorado)
Economy & TaxesEnvironment & Climate
Standard Summary
Comprehensive overview in 1-2 paragraphs

Wildfire Recovery Act would tighten and expand how the federal government shares costs for fire management assistance under the Stafford Act. The bill would guarantee a federal cost share of at least 75% for eligible Fire Management Assistance (FMA) activities for new appropriations, effectively increasing the federal role in wildfire response. It also requires a future rulemaking to set criteria for when the President could raise the federal share beyond 75%, including a metric to measure the financial impact on states and local governments. Finally, it directs FEMA to update its grants policy to allow reimbursement under section 420 for predeployment of domestic assets by states, localities, and tribal governments, aligning FMA with the treatment of major disaster assistance.

Key Points

  • 1The federal share for Fire Management Assistance (FMA) would be not less than 75% of eligible costs for amounts appropriated after enactment.
  • 2The change applies only to new appropriations, not existing funding already available under FMA.
  • 3Within three years, FEMA and the White House would undertake rulemaking to establish criteria for increasing the federal cost share beyond 75%, including a metric that assesses the financial impact on states/localities.
  • 4The bill requires a threshold or framework in the rulemaking to determine when higher federal support may be appropriate.
  • 5FEMA must update its grants policy under section 420 to allow reimbursement for predeployment of domestic assets by states, local governments, and tribal governments, consistent with how major disaster and emergency declarations are treated.

Impact Areas

Primary: State and local governments (including Tribal governments) that activate Fire Management Assistance during wildfires, which would face higher potential federal funding support for eligible costs.Secondary: FEMA and the federal budget, as higher cost shares could increase federal outlays for wildfire response; state and local budgeting practices may shift toward greater reliance on federal cost-share programs.Additional impacts: The rulemaking process could introduce new criteria and metrics that influence when and how the federal government increases the cost share; allowing predeployment reimbursements could affect state and local planning and spending for wildfire preparedness and early response.
Generated by gpt-5-nano on Oct 16, 2025